Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
Nevertheless IMR 4831 and H4831SC are various powders, you will see that in many circumstances, wherever one of these is mentioned one other will be also. Also, you'll find there is a reasonably dependable relationship between them in regards to listed loads.
I've used H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i use it. There usually are not quite a few cartridges which i use it for as I seem normally to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can not say that it won't work. It is simply that some other powders get the job done greater to get a provided cartridge. As an illustration, within the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and very high-quality groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Even so, RL19 was marginally better in accuracy, nevertheless the velocity was almost equivalent.
It truly is probably that no even further discussion is required, wherein scenario we suggest starting a whole new thread. If nonetheless you really feel your response is necessary you may nevertheless accomplish that.
We’d like to make certain you’re 18 several years of age or older ahead of making it possible for you to buy our site. Are you currently 18 years of age or more mature?
INgunner54 said: It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Uncovered a node and shot some teams.
Given that there won't appear to be any "Formal" Load Data available for this Load, can many of you deliver a place to begin with h4831sc this mixture and matters to consider when Functioning this Load up?
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a constrained supply of Varget, in addition to a great deal more accessible H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Practically completely, because that's exactly what the rifles shoot the top.
Im underneath the understanding I want to use h4831sc. I've read that these powders are equivalent besides the shorter grain size on the sc. Ought to I nonetheless be on the lookout for h4381sc?
Together with the smoother circulation characteristics will come additional uniform charge weights, while the person grains orient a lot more compactly, developing far better loading density.
What's more, it goes on to express that due to the fshorter grains, that load density could be somewhat bigger.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, They are entirely distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 getting significantly more quickly when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't treat them as precisely the same powder, since they most undoubtedly are h4831 vs h4831sc usually not.
It is really likely that no more discussion is required, during which scenario we advocate starting off a completely new thread. If however you feel your reaction is necessary you could still accomplish that.
However IMR 4831 and H4831SC are different powders, you can find that in many cases, where by one of them is shown the opposite will be too. Also, you will discover there is a reasonably consistent connection involving them with regard to listed loads.
I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with small to min prices. I’m chatting 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it absolutely was a lower 60s grain charge inside of a Norma scenario. Not what I was on h4831sc load data the lookout for, but precise nonetheless.